High throughput discovery of novel modulators of ROMK K+ channel activity: Analog Dose-Response - BioAssay Summary
The Renal Outer Medullary Potassium channel (ROMK, Kir1.1) is expressed in the renal tubule where it critically regulates fluid and electrolyte homeostasis (Hebert, 2005). An emerging body of evidence suggests that ROMK could be a target for a novel class loop diuretic that lowers blood pressure while preserving plasma potassium levels (Ji, 2008). Furthermore, homozygous loss-of-function more .. |
_ |
Tested Compounds Tested Compounds | All(20) | | | | | Active(11) | | | | Inactive(7) | | | | Unspecified(2) | | |
Tested Substances Tested Substances | All(20) | | | | | Active(11) | | | | Inactive(7) | | | | Unspecified(2) | | |
Related BioAssays Related BioAssays |
|
|
Target Depositor Specified Assays | AID | Name | Type | Comment |
|---|
| 2436 | High-throughput Discovery of Novel Modulators of ROMK K+ Channel Activity | summary | |
Description: Assay Provider: Jerod Denton Assay Provider Affiliation: Vanderbilt University Grant Title: High throughput discovery of novel modulators of ROMK K+ channel activity Grant Number: R21 NS057041-01
The Renal Outer Medullary Potassium channel (ROMK, Kir1.1) is expressed in the renal tubule where it critically regulates fluid and electrolyte homeostasis (Hebert, 2005). An emerging body of evidence suggests that ROMK could be a target for a novel class loop diuretic that lowers blood pressure while preserving plasma potassium levels (Ji, 2008). Furthermore, homozygous loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding ROMK (KCNJ1) cause antenatal Bartter syndrome, a severe salt and water wasting disease in infants (Simon, 1996). ROMK is thus an important pharmacological target for the management of disease. Its actual therapeutic value and drugability, however, are unknown due to the lack of small-molecule probes targeting the channel. The discovery of ROMK modulators will provide important new tools for studying the structure, function and therapeutic potential of ROMK and other inward rectifying potassium channels. Protocol The purpose of this assay to test synthesized compounds in thallium flux for their ability to dose-dependently inhibit ROMK function.
Experimental methods were as previously described (Lewis, 2009). Briefly, cells were plated in black-walled, clear-bottom plates and treated with Tet overnight to induce the expression of ROMK in serum-free media. The cells were loaded with FluoZin2 dye, incubated for 20 min at RT and washed with assay buffer (0.44 mM NaH2PO4, 4.17 mM NaHCO3, 137.93 mM NaCl, 0.338 mM Na2HPO4, 20 mM HEPES, 0.25 mM K2SO4, adjusted to 343 mOsm with sucrose). The plate was imaged on the Hamamatsu FDSS 6000 system to obtain F0, followed by compound addition. Compounds were serially diluted 3-fold to generate 11-point concentration curves. After 20 min at RT, thallium stimulus buffer (125 mM sodium gluconate, 12 mM thallium sulfate, 1 mM magnesium sulfate, 1.8 mM calcium gluconate, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, adjusted to 343 mOsm with sucrose) was added while simultaneously imaging for a total of 2 min acquisition time.
Data Handling: The kinetic fluorescence values (F) from each well were divided by the initial frame of the read (F0) to give the static ratio (F/F0) which corrects for variability in cell number and dye loading. The slope of the static ratio from 7 to 12 seconds was calculated for each compound concentration. An automated data analysis pipeline generated with Pipeline Pilot (Accelrys, San Diego, CA) and R statistics package (www.r-project.org) was used. TPNQ and assay buffer control wells were included on every plate and used to calculate the Z' (Zhang et al., 1999). The data were normalized to % TPNQ activity and the concentration response curves fit using Prism 5.0.
Result Definitions | TID | Name | Description | | Histogram | Type | Unit |
|---|
| Outcome | The BioAssay activity outcome | | | Outcome | |
| Score | The BioAssay activity ranking score | |  | Integer | |
| 1 | LMLID | Internal Reference | | | String | |
| 2 | VUID | Internal Reference 2 | | | String | |
| 3 | R1 C1 (0.0169μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 1 | |  | Float | μM |
| 4 | R1 C2 (0.0508μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 2 | |  | Float | μM |
| 5 | R1 C3 (0.152μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 3 | |  | Float | μM |
| 6 | R1 C4 (0.457μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 4 | |  | Float | μM |
| 7 | R1 C5 (1.37μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 5 | |  | Float | μM |
| 8 | R1 C6 (4.12μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 6 | |  | Float | μM |
| 9 | R1 C7 (12.3μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 7 | |  | Float | μM |
| 10 | R1 C8 (37μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 8 | |  | Float | μM |
| 11 | R1 C9 (111μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 9 | |  | Float | μM |
| 12 | R1 C10 (333μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 10 | |  | Float | μM |
| 13 | R1 C11 (1000μM**) | Value for replicate 1 at concentration 11 | |  | Float | μM |
| 14 | R2 C1 (0.0169μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 1 | |  | Float | μM |
| 15 | R2 C2 (0.0508μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 2 | |  | Float | μM |
| 16 | R2 C3 (0.152μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 3 | |  | Float | μM |
| 17 | R2 C4 (0.457μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 4 | |  | Float | μM |
| 18 | R2 C5 (1.37μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 5 | |  | Float | μM |
| 19 | R2 C6 (4.12μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 6 | |  | Float | μM |
| 20 | R2 C7 (12.3μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 7 | |  | Float | μM |
| 21 | R2 C8 (37μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 8 | |  | Float | μM |
| 22 | R2 C9 (111μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 9 | |  | Float | μM |
| 23 | R2 C10 (333μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 10 | |  | Float | μM |
| 24 | R2 C11 (1000μM**) | Value for replicate 2 at concentration 11 | |  | Float | μM |
| 25 | R3 C1 (0.0169μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 1 | |  | Float | μM |
| 26 | R3 C2 (0.0508μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 2 | |  | Float | μM |
| 27 | R3 C3 (0.152μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 3 | |  | Float | μM |
| 28 | R3 C4 (0.457μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 4 | |  | Float | μM |
| 29 | R3 C5 (1.37μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 5 | |  | Float | μM |
| 30 | R3 C6 (4.12μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 6 | |  | Float | μM |
| 31 | R3 C7 (12.3μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 7 | |  | Float | μM |
| 32 | R3 C8 (37μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 8 | |  | Float | μM |
| 33 | R3 C9 (111μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 9 | |  | Float | μM |
| 34 | R3 C10 (333μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 10 | |  | Float | μM |
| 35 | R3 C11 (1000μM**) | Value for replicate 3 at concentration 11 | |  | Float | μM |
| 36 | R4 C1 (0.0169μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 1 | |  | Float | μM |
| 37 | R4 C2 (0.0508μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 2 | |  | Float | μM |
| 38 | R4 C3 (0.152μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 3 | |  | Float | μM |
| 39 | R4 C4 (0.457μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 4 | |  | Float | μM |
| 40 | R4 C5 (1.37μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 5 | |  | Float | μM |
| 41 | R4 C6 (4.12μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 6 | |  | Float | μM |
| 42 | R4 C7 (12.3μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 7 | |  | Float | μM |
| 43 | R4 C8 (37μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 8 | |  | Float | μM |
| 44 | R4 C9 (111μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 9 | |  | Float | μM |
| 45 | R4 C10 (333μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 10 | |  | Float | μM |
| 46 | R4 C11 (1000μM**) | Value for replicate 4 at concentration 11 | |  | Float | μM |
| 47 | Fit Result | Fit type as determined by Prism | | | String | |
| 48 | Best-fit Value LogIC50 | Best fit value for the LogIC50 | |  | Float | |
| 49 | Std. Error LogIC50 | Standard Error for the LogIC50 | |  | Float | |
| 50 | CI LogIC50 | 95% Confidence Intervals for the LogIC50 | | | String | |
| 51 | Best-fit Value HillSlope | Best-fit value for Hill Slope | |  | Float | |
| 52 | Std. Error HillSlope | Standard Error for the Hill Slope | |  | Float | |
| 53 | CI HillSlope | 95% Confidence Intervals for the Hill Slope | | | String | |
| 54 | Best-Fit Value IC50 (M) | Best-fit value for the IC50 in Molar | |  | Float | |
| 55 | CI IC50 (M) | 95% Confidence Intervals for the IC50 value in Molar | | | String | |
| 56 | Best-Fit Value IC50 (uM)* | Best-fit value for the IC50 in micromolar | |  | Float | μM |
| 57 | Degrees of Freedom | Degrees of Freedom | |  | Integer | |
| 58 | R2 | R2 | |  | Float | |
| 59 | Absolute Sum of Squares | Absolute Sum of Squares | | | String | |
| 60 | Number of Points | Number of Points analyzed | |  | Integer | |
* Activity Concentration. ** Test Concentration. Additional Information Grant Number: R21 NS057041-01
Data Table (Concise) Classification
PageFrom: |